Digital Credit in Uganda: A Case for fair Competition

Aryampwera Shibah

August 4, 2023

Unfair competition in Digital Credit means conduct by digital credit providers to gain or seek to gain an advantage over their counterparts through misleading, deceptive, dishonest, fraudulent, coercive or unconscionable conduct in trade or commerce. In Uganda, digital credit has significantly grown in popularity as a way to reach previously underserved populations with financial services. […]

Unfair competition in Digital Credit means conduct by digital credit providers to gain or seek to gain an advantage over their counterparts through misleading, deceptive, dishonest, fraudulent, coercive or unconscionable conduct in trade or commerce.

In Uganda, digital credit has significantly grown in popularity as a way to reach previously underserved populations with financial services. Though the fast expansion of digital credit infrastructure has prompted concerns regarding fair competition and the need for appropriate laws, Uganda still has no competition Laws for digital financial providers.  The Ugandan Parliament in May 2023 passed the Competition Bill 2022, but this has not yet been gazetted, as such it is not yet legally effective in Uganda. The Bill is intended to facilitate fair competition in markets and prevent practices having adverse impacts on competition in markets.

Digital credit refers to the provision of loans and other financial services through digital platforms. In Uganda, digital credit has emerged as a game-changer, allowing individuals and small businesses to access credit quickly and conveniently. Platforms such as mobile money services and fintech apps have enabled borrowers to receive funds directly into their mobile wallets, revolutionizing the lending landscape. However in economies like Uganda’s, digital financial services markets are limited to one or two major providers which potentially encourages cartelistic or monopolistic behavior, and reduces innovation and customer choice.

As digital credit platforms proliferate, concerns have arisen regarding fair competition practices. Some key issues include:

  1. Market Concentration: The dominance of just a few of significant competitors in the digital credit market holds the potential to stifle competition and foster anti-competitive behavior. This concentration could restrict customer options and hinder innovation.

Without sufficient competition, digital credit providers may have less incentive to offer favorable terms and competitive pricing, leading to higher borrowing costs for consumers. This can indirectly impact borrowers by limiting competitive pressure on interest rates and fees.

  • Data Advantage: Digital credit platforms have access to vast amounts of data on borrowers, which offers them an unfair advantage over smaller competitors. For individualized lending decisions, risk analysis, and client retention, this data advantage can be used.
  • Protection of consumers and transparency: To safeguard customers, it is essential to provide transparency in digital credit processes. Hidden fees, unjust terms and conditions, and aggressive debt collection tactics raise questions. Maintaining consumer trust and ensuring fair treatment is essential for the sustainable growth of digital credit.

Unfair competition in Uganda’s digital credit sector has adverse effects on market growth, consumer protection, and the prevalence of fraud. It can drive digital credit providers to compromise on the quality of their services to cut costs or gain a competitive edge. This may lead to subpar loan terms, inadequate customer support, and unreliable repayment systems. In such an environment, fraudulent actors can exploit the resulting gaps, posing as legitimate providers to defraud unsuspecting borrowers.

The approaches to addressing unfair competition in the digital financial service industry is to encourage market entry and foster innovation through supportive policies and incentives. This can be done through facilitating the establishment of smaller digital credit providers, ensuring a level playing field, and promoting diverse business models which would drive healthy competition and limit the influence of dominant players.

Another approach to unfair competition is through Consumer education regarding rights, and responsible borrowing practices. Consumer awareness campaigns, financial literacy initiatives, and digital tools can empower individuals to make informed decisions, identify fraudulent practices, and report suspicious activities. For instance, The Uganda Communications Commission’s (UCC) TONFERA campaigns aimed  at creating awareness among members of the public on disinformation, usually referred to as ‘fake news’, cyber fraud, and their subsequent impact.

Unfair competition in Uganda’s digital credit sector has adverse effects on market growth, consumer protection, and the prevalence of fraud. In an environment with inadequate regulatory oversight, Unfair competition often thrives. Insufficient scrutiny can allow fraudulent actors to exploit loopholes, engage in predatory lending practices, and deceive consumers. The absence of robust regulations and enforcement mechanisms contributes to an environment ripe for fraudulent activities.

It is therefore prudent for government agencies in Uganda to put in place robust regulations and enforcement mechanisms to curb unfair competition in the digital credit industry to enable market growth, consumer protection and alleviate fraud in the digital credit market.

Recent Insights

June 5, 2023

How Africa’s Startup Ecosystem Could Benefit from AI

Artificial intelligence (AI) could contribute up to USD 15.7 trillion to the global economy by 2030, according to the World Economic Forum. The AI market in Africa, on the other…

June 5, 2023

Google Translate adds Luganda

Google Translate is a multilingual neural machine translation service developed by Google to translate text, documents and websites from one language into another. It offers a website interface, a mobile…